All servers · Government & law · Research & knowledge
AI Law Framework
com.ailawframework/ai-law-framework · v1.1.0
New (7 days)Tools changed (7 days)
Measured by MCP Station
| Last check | Reachable |
|---|---|
| Checked at | — |
| Check success 7 / 30 days | — |
| First-try success 30 days | — |
| Median response | — |
| Lookups 30 days | — |
| Authentication | No auth |
| MCP version | 2025-06-18 |
| Rank score | — |
| Declared risk | Read-only (all tools declare readOnlyHint) |
| Capabilities declared | extensions, prompts, resources, tools |
| Tool definitions | 14 tools · with description 100% · input schema is an object 100% · read/destructive hints 100% |
Description written by the publisher, not verified
Decide whether AI may be used for a legal task, who drafts and who checks. Australian law.
Connect
streamable-http · https://ailawframework.com/mcp
claude mcp add --transport http ai-law-framework https://ailawframework.com/mcp{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-law-framework": {
"url": "https://ailawframework.com/mcp"
}
}
}Tools as reported by the server
start_taskOpens a work record for one legal task and returns the clarifying questions the framework needs answered (step 1, define the task), less any already answered in `answers`. The first two are the country and, in Australia, the state or territory: ask them first. Read the skill ailf://skills/ai-law-frarecord_answersAdds the user’s answers to the clarifying questions to the work record. Returns the questions still open, or, once all are answered, the research the task requires.record_researchAdds research findings, each with its source, quote and confirmation status, to the work record. Returns the required research still missing, or the scoring anchors and the governance ceiling the evidence sets.assess_and_decideScores the AI option on adoption, efficiency and governance (step 2), caps governance by the recorded evidence, scores the manual route, and returns the decision, its reasons and the order of preference.plan_human_workSets the level of each of the seven stages of the task (step 3) from the recorded answers, research and decision, and returns what the lawyer and the AI may and may not do at each stage.work_recordReturns the work record as markdown (steps 4 and 5): the task, the evidence, the decision, the plan, what the AI did, and the checks, approval and release left for the lawyer.search_librarySearches the framework’s published practice areas, tasks, jurisdiction versions, jurisdictions, firm-wide obligations and software profiles. Returns titles, ids and ailawframework.com links.get_task_guidanceReturns one task from the practice library: how AI may be used, its level, what the lawyer must review, its checkpoints, restrictions and sources, and its jurisdiction versions.get_jurisdiction_guidanceReturns the framework’s notes for one jurisdiction, and which stored AI instruments apply to a task in a court or tribunal. Name the forum, or court "no" when no court is involved. A gap means no instrument is stored for that forum.get_software_profileReturns the framework’s research on one AI product and plan: its facts, the governance considerations found, and the cited sources with their review dates. Accepts a profile id or a product name.search_precedentsSearches the published precedent library (letters, agreements, clauses, checklists, forms, policies and more for every practice area) by title, summary and when to use it. Returns ids, titles, kinds, practice area ids, jurisdictions and the date each states the law as at. The full text is availableget_precedentReturns one published precedent’s details: summary, when to use it, authorities, the AI-use guidance (level, what AI may and must not do, what the lawyer checks), licence, the date it states the law as at and how the library maintains it. The text itself is available through the signed-in firm conneget_startedFor a new user, or when asked what this is: what the AI Law Framework decides, the first questions it asks (country, then state or territory), the five steps, the skills and starting prompts, and a fictional sample matter the user can run to see a finished work record.get_frameworkReturns the AI Law Framework’s rules: the five steps, the three pillars and their anchors, the decision rule, the four levels, the seven stages and their matrix, and the rules that admit no exception.
Tool changes
- 2026-10-19: start_task, record_answers, record_research, assess_and_decide, plan_human_work, work_record, search_library, get_task_guidance, get_jurisdiction_guidance, get_software_profile, search_precedents, get_precedent
- 2026-10-18: start_task, record_answers, record_research, assess_and_decide, plan_human_work, work_record, search_library, get_task_guidance, get_jurisdiction_guidance, get_software_profile, search_precedents, get_precedent
Website · JSON · Text for agents · Registry updated 2026-10-17