All servers · Databases · Payments & accounting · Code & repositories
Kong Reviews
com.kongreviews/kongreviews · v0.2.0
New (7 days)Has write/delete toolsTools changed (7 days)
Measured by MCP Station
| Last check | Reachable |
|---|---|
| Checked at | — |
| Check success 7 / 30 days | — |
| First-try success 30 days | — |
| Median response | — |
| Lookups 30 days | — |
| Authentication | No auth |
| MCP version | 2025-06-18 |
| Rank score | — |
| Declared risk | Has destructive tools (destructiveHint) |
| Capabilities declared | resources, tools |
| Tool definitions | 22 tools · with description 100% · input schema is an object 100% · read/destructive hints 100% |
Description written by the publisher, not verified
Pick a tech stack from a PRD and see what it costs now and at scale, after startup perks.
Connect
streamable-http · https://kongreviews.com/mcp
claude mcp add --transport http kongreviews https://kongreviews.com/mcp{
"mcpServers": {
"kongreviews": {
"url": "https://kongreviews.com/mcp"
}
}
}Tools as reported by the server
recommend_stackStart here. Describe the product in plain language and get a recommended stack with costs now and at scale, in one call. Write the description as the user would: what the product does, who signs in and how, how it charges, which emails it sends, compliance or data-region needs, and expected users nolist_vendorsList vendors in the pricing catalogue, optionally for one category (hosting, database, auth, email, payments, observability, ai, edge, app_store, coding).list_capabilitiesList capability ids (features, compliance, regions) that requirements can reference, e.g. auth.saml_sso, region.eu, payments.merchant_of_record.search_directorySearch the directory of developer services (hosting, databases, auth, email, SMS, payments, analytics, monitoring, LLM APIs, vector databases, search, CMS and more): what each provider sells, its free tier, its lowest paid price, caveats and the pricing page it came from. Wider than the cost engine:search_showcaseBrowse products startups have built and the stack each runs on: what it is, whether it is a website, a mobile app, both or a desktop app, its category and pricing, and every framework and service it uses (services link to the directory and, where priced, the cost engine). Use it to find real stacksget_pricingStructured pricing and capabilities for one vendor: every plan, base fee, metered usage, limits, unmodelled costs, lock-in notes, source URL and verification date.estimate_costMonthly cost for one vendor at a given scale. Give mau (monthly active users) and a usage profile, or exact usage numbers. Picks the cheapest plan that fits unless plan_id is set. Example: {"vendor_id":"clerk","mau":25000}.compare_vendorsRank vendors in one category at a given scale. Vendors meeting every must-have come first, then cheapest. Ranking is by cost and fit only. Example: {"category":"auth","mau":50000,"requirements":[{"capability":"auth.saml_sso"}]}.check_fitFor each vendor, show whether each requirement is met on its cheapest plan, needs a higher tier (with that tier's cost), or is missing.project_stackMonth-by-month cost for a whole stack as users grow, with startup perks applied if requested, plus cost cliffs (forced plan upgrades, sharp jumps, credits running out). Example: {"vendors":[{"vendor_id":"supabase"},{"vendor_id":"vercel"}],"start_mau":2000,"monthly_growth":0.15,"months":24,"apply_perfind_cost_cliffsScan a range of user counts for one vendor and report where cost jumps: forced plan upgrades and points where usage charges start. Example: {"vendor_id":"clerk","from_mau":1000,"to_mau":200000}.find_perksStartup credits for the given vendors, and whether you qualify based on your bank, incorporation provider, accelerator or funding. Example: {"vendor_ids":["supabase","posthog"],"founder":{"gateways":["mercury"]}}.extract_requirementsTurn PRD or spec text into structured requirements (scale, capabilities, compliance, regions, budget) for plan_stack, without planning. recommend_stack does both in one call. Each requirement quotes the sentence it came from. Show them to the user to confirm before planning. Without a model on the splan_stackGiven confirmed requirements as capability ids, recommend a vendor per category with a runner-up, requirement fit, cost now, cost at forecast scale, year-one cost after perks, cost cliffs, trade-offs and blockers. Use recommend_stack instead when you only have a plain-language description. Example:evaluate_changeWhen something changes (bill too high, growth, a missing feature such as SSO, a renewal), compare staying on the current plan, optimising with the same vendor, and switching vendor, including one-off switching cost and the month switching pays off. Example: {"category":"auth","current":{"vendor_id":detect_stackWork out which services an existing app runs on, from its files, a public GitHub repo, or its live website. From an AI coding app, read the project yourself and pass the files that say the most: package.json (or requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, Gemfile, go.mod, pubspec.yaml, Podfile), .env.exampleaudit_stackAssess the stack an existing app runs on and recommend what to do. For each service: its plan, cost now and in 12 months, must-haves it lacks, cost jumps in the next year, lock-in, and a verdict (keep, watch, optimise, switch or fix) with savings, one-off moving cost and the month a switch pays off.save_stackSave a recommended stack to the signed-in user's Kong Reviews account so it can be reopened later and compared with current prices. Pass the share_url from recommend_stack or plan_stack (preferred) or the plan_stack arguments, plus a short name such as "Yoga booking MVP". Needs sign-in: if the userlist_saved_stacksList the stacks the signed-in user saved, newest first, with their monthly cost when saved and a link to each. Use it when the user mentions "my stacks", "the stack I saved" or a saved stack by name; then call get_saved_stack for one of them. Needs sign-in. How to present: a short table of name, savget_saved_stackRe-run a saved stack with today's catalogue and compare it with when it was saved: monthly cost then and now, picks that changed, and vendors whose pricing changed. Use it when the user asks about a stack they saved, or whether prices moved. Pass the id from list_saved_stacks. Needs sign-in. How todelete_saved_stackwrite/deletePermanently delete one of the signed-in user's saved stacks by id. Only call it when the user explicitly asks to delete that stack; confirm the name first. Needs sign-in.delete_accountwrite/deletePermanently delete the signed-in user's Kong Reviews account: their GitHub sign-in link and every saved stack. This cannot be undone. Only call it when the user explicitly asks to delete their account, after telling them what will be removed; pass confirm exactly as "delete my account". Needs sign-i
Tool changes
- 2026-10-24: recommend_stack, list_vendors, list_capabilities, search_directory, search_showcase, get_pricing, estimate_cost, compare_vendors, check_fit, project_stack, find_cost_cliffs, find_perks
- 2026-10-23: recommend_stack, list_vendors, list_capabilities, get_pricing, estimate_cost, compare_vendors, check_fit, project_stack, find_cost_cliffs, find_perks, extract_requirements, plan_stack
Website · JSON · Text for agents · Registry updated 2026-10-23