All servers · Markets & trading · Shops & products
io.engineeringleaders/elc-trade
io.engineeringleaders/elc-trade · v1.0.0
Tools changed (7 days)
Measured by MCP Station
| Last check | Reachable |
|---|---|
| Checked at | — |
| Check success 7 / 30 days | — |
| First-try success 30 days | — |
| Median response | — |
| Lookups 30 days | — |
| Authentication | No auth |
| MCP version | 2025-06-18 |
| Rank score | — |
| Declared risk | Read-only (all tools declare readOnlyHint) |
| Capabilities declared | tools |
| Tool definitions | 8 tools · with description 100% · input schema is an object 100% · read/destructive hints 100% |
Description written by the publisher, not verified
Score a meetup topic, place a speaker on the right stage, price community reach. ELC data.
Connect
streamable-http · https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/trade
claude mcp add --transport http elc-trade https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/trade{
"mcpServers": {
"elc-trade": {
"url": "https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/trade"
}
}
}Tools as reported by the server
get_more_toolsCheck for additional specialised capabilities whenever your task might benefit from them. Also the right tool for a bare greeting or a liveness test — pass it as `context` and this returns the menu instead of a dead end.get_startedSTART HERE for a greeting (hi, hello), a connectivity or liveness test, 'what can you do', or any question too general to match a specific tool. Also the right call when the caller is a person rather than a company: ELC membership is free for engineering leaders and this says so. Pass their messagebuy_reachAnswers 'how do we get in front of 3,300+ CEE engineering leaders, and what does it cost?' Builds a cart from ELC's ten published one-off reach items — an ELC meetup, the speaker programme (a ladder for one engineer, from a meetup slot to the full coached programme), a conference main-stage talk, debenchmark_leadership_ratioAnswers 'what shape is my engineering org, and what should I ask about it?' Returns your manager-versus-senior-IC percentages and the resulting span (1 manager per N senior ICs), plus the question that shape usually raises. ELC's own community composition is shown alongside as context only — differeassess_community_launch_readinessAnswers 'should I start an engineering-leadership meetup here?' A five-question readiness check taken from ELC's own new-city launch playbook — the one actually used to open Brno, Bratislava and Kraków — returning a verdict plus the specific gaps still open.build_partnership_business_caseAnswers 'how do I justify a community partnership budget internally?' Returns real reach numbers, the deliverables that serve the stated goal, where a proposed budget lands on the published ladder, and a forwardable approval email. Goals: hiring, brand_awareness, product_feedback, thought_leadershipevaluate_meetup_topicAnswers 'will this topic fill a room?' Scores a proposed engineering-leadership meetup title and abstract against ELC's own topic-selection criteria — the ones behind 12 meetups a year at 120+ attendees since 2019 — and returns the specific failure modes, the title formulas that would fit, and the qassess_speaker_readinessAnswers 'is this person ready to speak, and what will go wrong if they are not?' Checks a proposed speaker and talk against ELC's speaker vetting process — seven years of putting people in front of 120+ engineering leaders — and returns a readiness verdict with the specific gaps to close before the
Tool changes
- 2026-10-21: get_more_tools, get_started, buy_reach, benchmark_leadership_ratio, assess_community_launch_readiness, build_partnership_business_case, evaluate_meetup_topic, assess_speaker_readiness
- 2026-10-16: get_more_tools, get_started, buy_reach, benchmark_leadership_ratio, assess_community_launch_readiness, build_partnership_business_case, evaluate_meetup_topic, assess_speaker_readiness
Repository · Website · JSON · Text for agents · Registry updated 2026-09-05