All servers · Datasets & public data · Monitoring & logs

io.github.klmlfl/case-doha-record

io.github.klmlfl/case-doha-record · v1.0.0

No registry update 90+ days

Measured by MCP Station

Last check	Reachable
Checked at	—
Check success 7 / 30 days	—
First-try success 30 days	—
Median response	—
Lookups 30 days	—
Authentication	No auth
MCP version	2025-06-18
Rank score	—
Declared risk	Read-only (all tools declare readOnlyHint)
Capabilities declared	tools
Tool definitions	7 tools · with description 100% · input schema is an object 100% · read/destructive hints 100%

Description written by the publisher, not verified

Search 30,000+ decided U.S. DOHA security-clearance decisions, cited to the public record.

Connect

streamable-http · https://www.clearancesearchengine.com/api/mcp

claude mcp add --transport http case-doha-record https://www.clearancesearchengine.com/api/mcp

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "case-doha-record": {
      "url": "https://www.clearancesearchengine.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Tools as reported by the server

search_cases
Search 30,000+ decided public DOHA security-clearance decisions (1996 to present). Full-text query plus filters. Returns matching cases with outcome, date, guidelines, and a citable URL each.
get_case
Fetch one decided DOHA case in full: what was alleged, the judge's findings per allegation, per-guideline formal findings, outcome, judge, representation, and appeal history. Use case_id from search_cases.
similar_cases
The most similar decided cases to a given case, ranked by how alike the ALLEGATIONS read (never by outcome). Same list shown on the case page.
get_statistics
Grant/denial statistics over decided hearing-level DOHA cases, grouped by year or by guideline, always with sample sizes. Same population rules as the site's Insights page.
get_timelines
Measured DOHA timelines: median days from Statement of Reasons to hearing and to decision, from dates stated in the decisions themselves. Optionally scoped to one decision year.
get_conduct_recency
How much time had passed between the most recent conduct and the decision, measured from dates stated in the decisions, for the incident-type concerns (drugs, alcohol, criminal conduct, sexual behavior, protected information, IT misuse). Reports median years before favorable vs unfavorable decisions
get_candor_outcomes
How cases with a candor allegation (falsification, omission, or lack of candor) were resolved in the decided record: the favorable rate with vs without such an allegation, when the judge found a deliberate falsification vs when the applicant rebutted it, and when the applicant corrected the record b

Repository · Website · JSON · Text for agents · Registry updated 2026-07-18